Montenegrin government defends move to send weapons to Afghanistan

23/08/2007

Responding to criticism from opposition parties, the government insists its donation of automatic rifles, guns and ammunition is justified.

By Nedjeljko Rudovic for Southeast European Times in Podgorica - 23/08/07

photo

Montenegro has donated automatic rifles, machine guns and bullets to Afghan troops battling Taliban militants. [Getty Images]

Montenegro's government is defending its decision to send surplus weapons and ammunition to Afghanistan as a contribution to the global fight against terrorism.

On August 14th, the cabinet agreed to donate around 1,500 automatic rifles, 100 machine guns and 250,000 bullets to Afghan troops battling the Taliban. The explanation was that Montenegro wants to help stabilise Afghanistan and contribute to global security.

Opposition parties have questioned the move. The Liberal Party (LP), which opposes Montenegro's entry into NATO, says it would be better if humanitarian aid were sent to Afghanistan, rather than weapons.

The Serbian List, which argues that Montenegro should not rush to join NATO, charges that rules were violated because parliament did not endorse the government's decision.

However, authorities are convinced they made the right decision.

"Terrorism is identified in our defence strategy as a major danger to our national security. With this contribution, Montenegro shows devotion to the interests of the international community and protects its own interests," the defence ministry said in a statement.

The ministry says everything was done lawfully. Parliamentary approval, it argues, is only needed when troops are being sent abroad, and not in case of a simple donation.

According to the ministry, obligations of this kind stem from Montenegro's membership in the NATO Partnership for Peace (PfP) programme.

The LP ridicules the government's argument that weapons donations are needed to stabilise Afghanistan. "Donations in guns and ammunition are a great contribution to establishing peace in that part of the world," it commented sarcastically.

"What kind of humanitarianism is when you help someone by sending him weapons instead of humanitarian aid?" said LP deputy Zoran Zivkovic.

While military analysts agree that sending weapons and ammunition to Afghanistan will help Montenegro draw closer to NATO, some say there is a potential cost to national security.

Savo Kentera of the Euro-Atlantic Club thinks Montenegro should not only donate weapons but also send troops.

Related Articles

Loading

By contrast, Aleksander Dedovic of the Alpha Centre says the government's decision should be seen as nothing more than a form of membership dues for PfP. Montenegro will not gain any friends in the Muslim world with this move, he argues.

Several other countries in the region have also sent weapons and ammunition to Afghanistan in recent years.

In 2003. Croatia sent $2m worth of ammunition, and in January of this year the country decided to send 1,000 automatic rifles and 300,000 bullets.

In 2004, Albania sent weapons and ammunition worth $746,000. Bosnia and Herzegovina has sent automatic rifles, uniforms and ammunition worth $2.8m.

This content was commissioned for SETimes.com.
Loading

Vote

Loading
  • Email to a friend
  • icon Print Version
  • Share/Save/Bookmark.

We welcome your comments on SETimes's articles.

It is our hope that you will use this forum to interact with other readers across Southeast Europe. In order to keep this experience interesting, we ask you to follow the rules outlined in the comments policy. By submitting comments, you are consenting to these rules. While SETimes.com encourages discussion on all subjects, including sensitive ones, the comments posted are solely the views of those submitting them. SETimes.com does not necessarily endorse or agree with the ideas, views, or opinions voiced in these comments. SETimes.com welcomes constructive discussion but discourages the use of copy-pasted materials, unaccompanied links and one-line slogans. This is a moderated forum. Comments deemed abusive, offensive, or those containing profanity may not be published.

SETimes's Comments Policy

SETimes logo

Kosovo: Impasse at the Border

Kosovo: Impasse at the Border

Energy: Issues and Trends

Energy: Issues and Trends

Changing Perceptions: Women in the Balkans

Changing Perceptions: Women in the Balkans

The Balkans: Going green

The Balkans: Going green
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading

Poll

The EU recently chose to delay granting candidate status to Serbia, dashing expectations that the milestone would be achieved this year. How serious is the political damage to President Boris Tadic and the ruling coalition?

Very serious
Serious
Moderate
Insignificant
No damage



View results Add comments