Moscow reaps fruit of long-term plan

22/02/2010

Since 1998, when Lukoil set up shop in Bulgaria, Russia has slowly increased its presence and influence in Balkan energy markets by buying companies throughout the region.

Analysis by Marko Biocina for Southeast European Times in Zagreb -- 22/02/10

photo

Russia continues to aggressively develop and control the flow of oil and natural gas in the region. [Getty Images]

Over the past ten years, Russian oil companies have become dominant market leaders in the distribution of oil throughout Southeastern Europe. Russia continues to aggressively develop and control the flow of oil and natural gas in the region. This, observers say, was calculated for significant influence -- both commercial and political -- in the region.

When the Russian oil company Lukoil built its first petrol filling station in the Balkans -- a 1998 project in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia -- few analysts saw it as the beginning of a long-term strategy for energy dominance in Southeastern Europe.

The most recent evidence of Russian's plan occurred in March 2009 when Surgutneftegaz bought a 21% ownership stake in Hungary's central energetic company MOL, previously held by Austrian OMV.

Surgutneftegaz is one of Russia's least transparent oil companies, with alleged ownership ties to Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. By buying into the Hungarian company, Surgutneftegaz automatically gained a stake in Croatia's INA, whose 47% share is owned by MOL.

To limit Surgutneftegaz's influence, the Hungarian company changed its shareholder voting rules. But there is no doubt that by entering into the ownership structure of MOL and INA, the Russians achieved entry into the Croatian and Hungarian market. This is not only a business triumph, but points to the geopolitical success of a ten-year Russian strategy.

Russian companies now operate in all of the energy markets of Southeastern Europe.

The dominant position in Bulgaria is held by Lukoil, which also has operations in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Montenegro and Croatia. Russia's influence in Serbia was further strengthened last year when state-owned Gazprom took over Naftna Industries in Serbia. In BiH, Russia owns Naftna Industries in Republika Srpska (NIRS).

It is clear that none of this occurred by chance or without great forethought. Indeed, the long-term strategy was executed through the business and political sectors, with the business component unfolding over a decade.

photo

The dominant position in Bulgaria is held by Lukoil, which also has operations in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Croatia. [Getty Images]

During that time, some Russian companies made deals for short-term losses now seen as a bigger strategy for later success. The Russians expanded in the region by buying up existing firms and if that failed, set up and developed their own energy firms connected to existing ones.

The process was costly, but well co-ordinated. In the final tally, Russian companies will have achieved almost complete control of retail sales, refineries and oil and natural gas transportation systems in every Southeastern European country in the next few years.

One year after the privately run Lukoil -- owned in part by the US-based ConocoPhillips -- set up business in Bulgaria, it bought 58% of the Neftochim refinery for 74m euros. Lukoil is considered the most transparent of all Russian oil companies. The Bulgarian plant purchased in 1999 is located in the Black Sea city of Burgas.

Lukoil's Burgas refinery is the largest in the Balkans and has become a base for further Lukoil development throughout the region. Lukoil is also one of the biggest companies in Bulgaria, generating 9% of the Bulgarian GDP and paying one-fourth of all tax revenue in the country.

In late 2003, the company undertook its largest investment when it purchased a 79.5% of Serbian oil company Beopetrol for 117m euros. Beopetrol owned about 200 petrol filling stations, and held 20% of the retail market for oil derivatives in Serbia.

Most of the petrol filling stations were once owned by INA and were seized by Serbia when the Yugoslav war broke out. Beopetrol's service stations were outdated and burdened with a variety of property rights problems.

Lukoil spent over five years and 76m euros to turn the company around before it managed to turn a profit in Serbia. These problems in Serbia slowed the company's expansion plans and Lukoil's next acquisition didn't occur for another two years.

On August 17th 2005, based on a deal hammered out with the Macedonian government, a Lukoil subsidiary was set up in that country which now runs a dozen service stations. Many analysts were amazed at the time that a company as large as Lukoil would spend significant resources on a market as small and closed as Macedonia. But it is clear that the company felt it was important to secure a presence in every country in the region.

In 2006, Lukoil tried to do business in Slovenia by way of a strategic partnership with the Slovenian state-owned company Petrol. The deal was thwarted by Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa, allegedly after receiving direct instructions from Brussels to do so. Nevertheless, Lukoil that same year continued to expand its business, and in October of 2006 a subsidiary company was set up in Montenegro.

Negotiations were launched that same year on the privatisation of NIRS with Russian investors. The company includes a crude oil refinery in Bosanski Brod, an oil refinery in Modrica and the Banja Luka-based Petrol distribution company.

The deal was wrapped up ten months later. And while RS Prime Minister Milorad Dodik said at the time that it was an excellent deal for his nation and the Russian partners would invest significant funds to develop refineries, a report by the local branch of NGO Transparency International said the entire transaction was marked by irregularities.

photo

In late 2007, a third Russian player emerged in the Balkans -- the state-owned energy giant Gazprom. [File]

Dodik claimed that the refinery was being sold to Russian company Zarubezhneft, even though the formal owner of the refinery turned out to be a previously unknown firm called Neftgazinkor. And the money to be used for the purchase was sent from the account of the Russian commercial bank Vnesheconombank. This left the true owners of the refinery unknown, with suspicions that they are close to the leadership of Gazprom.

In 2007, Lukoil began to show serious interest in the Croatian market. The company tried to buy Tifon from retired General Ivan Cermak. Tifon was a significant retail chain with 36 modern petrol filling stations, some twenty new locations and a market share of 7%.

Such an acquisition would have allowed Lukoil to compete with INA in a very short time. But Hungary's MOL made a better offer and Lukoil was forced to delay its entry to the Croatian market. It did so in April of 2008 when it purchased a small Croatian firm called Europa Mil, with eight service stations and a river terminal in Vukovar.

Almost parallel to this acquisition, Lukoil purchased the Roksped chain of service stations in Montenegro for 26.5m euros. Few saw Lukoil's operations in the region as a threat, mostly because of the positive image it had as a privately owned company. That attitude changed only after companies under the direct control of the Russian leadership began operating in Serbia and BiH.

Related Articles

Loading

In late 2007, a third Russian player emerged in the Balkans -- the state-owned energy giant Gazprom. It intended to buy NIS from the state through a subsidiary company, Gazproneft.

The Russians paid 400m euros for NIS and agreed to invest a further 550m euros by 2012. The deal was signed by Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica. Independent analysts said the company was sold for significantly less than it was worth and speculated that this was with the aim of securing Russian political support in the Serbian campaign against the independence of Kosovo.

In 2007, NIS saw profits of 125m euros and it paid 1.2 billion euros in taxes. Based on these figures, many analysts concluded that Serbia handed over control of its energy system to Russia at a very cheap price. The Russians gain a similar control in Hungary if they succeed in achieving key ownership in MOL.

So far, this hasn't happened. But it would undoubtedly be seen as a significant increase in Russian influence. Because some of the countries in the region are already EU members -- and considering that others will become members in the future -- it can be assumed that the Russians are establishing future political leverage within the EU via one of the most important issues of the 21st century: energy.

This content was commissioned for SETimes.com.
Loading

Vote

Loading
  • Email to a friend
  • icon Print Version
  • Share/Save/Bookmark.

We welcome your comments on SETimes's articles.

It is our hope that you will use this forum to interact with other readers across Southeast Europe. In order to keep this experience interesting, we ask you to follow the rules outlined in the comments policy. By submitting comments, you are consenting to these rules. While SETimes.com encourages discussion on all subjects, including sensitive ones, the comments posted are solely the views of those submitting them. SETimes.com does not necessarily endorse or agree with the ideas, views, or opinions voiced in these comments. SETimes.com welcomes constructive discussion but discourages the use of copy-pasted materials, unaccompanied links and one-line slogans. This is a moderated forum. Comments deemed abusive, offensive, or those containing profanity may not be published.

SETimes's Comments Policy

SETimes logo

Kosovo: Impasse at the Border

Kosovo: Impasse at the Border

Energy: Issues and Trends

Energy: Issues and Trends

Changing Perceptions: Women in the Balkans

Changing Perceptions: Women in the Balkans

The Balkans: Going green

The Balkans: Going green
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading

Poll

The EU recently chose to delay granting candidate status to Serbia, dashing expectations that the milestone would be achieved this year. How serious is the political damage to President Boris Tadic and the ruling coalition?

Very serious
Serious
Moderate
Insignificant
No damage



View results Add comments